← Back

AthenaHQ

Product Design

Designing a modular dashboard for marketers who need to monitor, interpret, and present AI visibility data.

Role

Product Designer

Team

1 Designer

4 Developers

Timeline

5 Weeks

Tools

Figma

Claude Code

Before

The original dashboard felt dense before users even knew where to look

The problem was not a lack of data. It was that everything arrived at once: weak hierarchy, too many competing modules, and no clear path from monitoring to reporting.

Original Athena dashboard showing a dense wall of charts and tables

Problem 01

No clear hierarchy. Every module competes for attention.

Problem 02

Too many chart types and tables stacked at once.

Problem 03

No role-based path for CMOs, SEOs, or analysts.

Problem 04

Hard to turn what you see into a report teams can reuse.

Scanning

Users had to decode the layout before they could understand the data.

Investigation

The same dashboard tried to serve high-level monitoring and deep analysis at once.

Reporting

There was no clean way to turn insight into an artifact for decks or recurring updates.

Context

Different stakeholders, different needs, one dashboard

Athena had strong AI visibility data, but one fixed dashboard was forcing very different users into the same workflow. As the product matured, the real challenge was not getting more data on screen. It was helping each role get to the job they came to do faster.

What users needed

The same product had to support fast executive monitoring, deeper investigation, and repeatable reporting.

CMOs

Needed a fast pulse on brand momentum without wading through the full system.

SEOs

Needed prompt-level visibility so they could investigate what changed and why.

Analysts

Needed reusable outputs they could bring into recurring leadership updates.

Signal from research

One interview line captured the gap between having data and actually being able to use it.

“I've got all the instruments that I need. But I gotta put together a symphony now.”

CMO, Coinbase Canada

Design goals

I reframed the opportunity around the three jobs the dashboard actually needed to support: quick monitoring, deeper investigation, and easier reporting.

How might we

Turn Athena's AI visibility data into a dashboard that supports quick monitoring, deeper investigation, and easier reporting?

Compare the right slices of data

Make it easy to shift between brand terms, products, markets, and growth signals.

Create a simple reporting rhythm

Support a repeatable flow from data point to insight to next action.

Export cleanly into decks and docs

Help teams move useful evidence out of the dashboard without reformatting it by hand.

Create a shared source of truth

Give different roles one system they can trust even if they use it in different ways.

Solution

A strong default that works out of the box

Olympus opens with a structured overview: key metrics first, deeper modules below. Users can get oriented immediately without configuring anything.

Olympus default dashboard showing share of voice, brand traits, citation rate, and model-level visibility

One system for different views and roles

Rather than creating separate dashboards for CMOs, SEOs, and PMMs, the system lets teams select, reorder, and remove widgets to match the questions they care about most.

Dashboard settings panel showing selected and configurable widget modules

From dashboard to presentation in one click

The key feature was not the export button itself. It was the artifact users got from it: clean widget graphics they could drop straight into decks and recurring updates. Reset kept that workflow low-risk.

Inside Athena

Athena dashboard widget view
Export PNG

then

Drop into deck

What export creates

Share of voice widget

Brand traits widget

Slide deck

Exploration

Full report generation was too heavy

We explored a multi-step flow for generating PDF reports from dashboard data: pick a goal, select focus areas, and export a formatted document. But the workflow was too tedious. Users didn't want a new artifact. They wanted to pull specific widgets into existing decks and docs. That insight pushed export toward the simpler widget-level action instead.

Report goal selection with templates
Report templates and custom prompt
Custom prompt input for report generation
Focus areas selection with draggable modules
Generated report with high-impact insights

Choose a report goal

Precedent

This pattern already works at scale

Stripe and Shopify both use modular, customizable dashboards. Strong defaults with the ability to add, remove, and rearrange widgets.

Stripe

Default overview with + Add and Edit controls. Edit mode lets users remove widgets. + Add opens a picker to pull in new ones.

Stripe default dashboard overview
Stripe edit mode with removable widgets
Stripe widget picker modal

Default dashboard

Shopify

Users can drag, reposition, and resize displayed analytics to their liking.

Shopify analytics library for drag, reposition, and resize

Analytics dashboard customization

Key Decisions

Useful by default, customizable when needed

The dashboard has to feel useful before anyone touches settings. Customization is additive, not required.

Each widget helps tell the story

Each module plays a role: summarize, compare, track momentum, or investigate. The point was not just to show data, but to make it easier to communicate.

Communication over analysis

The biggest unmet need was getting insights out of the product and into decks, docs, and recurring updates.

Safe to experiment

Reset returns users to a known baseline. Flexibility should feel approachable, not risky.

Outcome

From vision to roadmap

The Olympus concept became the foundation for AthenaHQ's Q1 dashboard redesign. Configurable widgets and the export workflow shipped as the default architecture, replacing the original fixed layout.

2x

Peak daily active users after the modular Olympus dashboard shipped.

25%

Increase in feature adoption from the Proactive Insights Engine, which translated complex AI signals into actionable guidance.

~2 months

Of engineering time saved by pivoting through user research before building a low-impact feature.

Reflection

A dashboard is rarely just a dashboard

Dashboards sit inside workflows.

The hardest part was not choosing which charts to show. It was figuring out how one system could stay coherent while serving different stakeholders and supporting the stories they need to tell.

AI accelerated direction, not decisions.

Claude Code helped me move faster through interface directions. But the real work was defining product logic, user needs, and the kind of experience Athena needed to become.